Case Studies

This case study compares Brinell hardness testing with PIP testing for mapping mechanical property gradients in a hot-rolled high-strength steel beam. While hardness and PIP-derived UTS both showed around 30% variation, PIP revealed a much larger yield-strength drop from approximately 750 MPa at the edge to 450 MPa at the centre. Full stress-strain curves also exposed major differences in work hardening, providing richer data for design, simulation, and process optimisation at high resolution.

Our partner, WSP required an in-situ, non-destructive test solution with the yield- and tensile-strength accuracy of tensile testing. The solution was Profilometry-based Indentation Plastometry (PIP). This ASTM-standardized test method combines an indentation test with on-site FEA analysis.

This case study examines how applied load alters Vickers hardness measurements on two common engineering materials and considers the implications for how hardness data should be reported, compared, and used to inform design decisions.

WAAM builds are deposited layer-by-layer, with complex thermal cycles that can create heterogeneous microstructures and potential property variation across a component. Heat accumulation, deposition path, and build geometry can all influence the mechanical properties in different regions of a part. This complexity becomes even greater when exploring transitions from one material composition to another.

What can a single AM part really tell you? See how NASA used PIP testing to reveal a 15% hidden mechanical property variation across a complex LPBF component that conventional tests would have missed.

In this case study, we follow how a testing provider used the PLX-Portable to overcome these vibration hurdles and deliver accurate results, on time and with confidence, helping a major North American operator meet its compliance obligations.

Innovation in advanced manufacturing is transforming the way in which we produce products across a range of industrial settings. But in order to achieve this potential, researchers need fast, reliable strategies for material characterisation, process optimisation, and quality control.

Cost and time constraints in Additive Manufacturing (AM) parameter development have traditionally separated parameter selection from mechanical property assessment. This flawed method often leads to costly delays, wasted innovation, and misleading results due to initial data shortages and unexpected material behaviour. Could prioritizing mechanical properties from the start be a feasible solution?

From aircraft engines and hot gas pipelines to power station cladding, metallic materials are widely used in high-temperature applications. Understanding mechanical properties at these elevated temperatures is crucial for optimising part performance, ensuring integrity in safety-critical applications and predicting part lifetime under these extreme conditions.

In collaboration with Alloyed, we explore how mechanical properties differ across sections of an additively manufactured part and discover how testing directly on a part ensures that AM designs will deliver performance that users can rely on.

Testing materials under the conditions they’re likely to experience in service is vital to understand both performance and lifetime. For many components, this involves exposure to high temperatures, whether that’s in an aerospace engine or a large-scale bakery oven. Traditionally, high-temperature tensile testing has been the gold standard for assessing mechanical properties in such conditions. However, this method demands highly specific testing samples, leading to significant costs, operational complexity, and in some cases, making high-temperature testing impractical or even unfeasible.

In this case study with Renishaw, we uncover how the varying temperatures throughout a furnace have a significant impact on the mechanical properties of AM parts, in this case showing over 10% variation in yield strength, and how these findings have led Renishaw to optimise their heat treatment process, ensuring consistency and increasing confidence in part performance.

Where machining tensile specimens for testing is not an option, hardness is often considered as a solution. This poses a significant limitation; while hardness testing offers advantages such as affordability, speed, ease of use, and suitability for testing small specimens, a hardness number is not a fundamental material property. Furthermore, practitioners are limited to conversions into a limited set of material property values, as hardness numbers cannot give full stress-strain curves, which means that without further information finite element modelling cannot always be conducted accurately

In collaboration with the University of Limerick, this case study investigates the suitability of PIP testing to explore the detection of property variations in parts produced through additive manufacturing.

The objective of this case study was to obtain accurate mechanical testing data for a small, extruded aluminium part from a bike rim, provided by Spur, using PIP testing. If successful, it would demonstrate a practical way of obtaining key data for small and complex components with minimal processing and turnaround times.

In this case study, conducted in collaboration with Professor Roger Reed and Dr. Tony Tang from the University of Oxford, we assess whether PIP testing can be used to measure stress-strain curves on small alloy samples made by additive manufacturing.

The aim of this case study, conducted in conjunction with Ovako, was to use PIP testing to characterise a case-hardened layer by indenting planar surfaces after progressive removal of thin surface layers.

The objective in this study, conducted in collaboration with The Welding Institute, was to determine if PIP testing could accurately map the stress-strain behaviour across a weld with a fine spatial resolution, and to quantify the time and cost savings that PIP offers over traditional tensile testing when used for characterising weld mechanical properties.

In this study we use PIP testing to spatially map the variations in mechanical properties across a large forged Aluminum component

This investigation relates to two types of sample supplied by Energy Densification Systems. These were both a shaped component of Hardox steel, with and without a cermet insert brazed into it. Via PIP testing it was possible to obtain stress-strain relationships for local areas of the component. The heat treatment associated with the brazing process (which was not revealed to PLX) induced significant changes in the stress/strain responses of all locations.